- Latest
-
Topics
Philosophy
Mind & Behavior
Business
-
Videos
Latest VideosWhy Einstein called awe the fundamental emotion If you’ve gotten goosebumps when hearing a story about a stranger’s selfless heroism, or you’ve felt your chest swell at...How facing adversity can help you live a deeper, more meaningful life “There would be something very, very empty and meaningless about [a] sort of life with no problems.”Can you measure love? 3 experts discuss From neuroscience to philosophy, experts reveal why compassion may be the most important human skill we have.How accepting impermanence can end the struggle to “fix” your life “The idea is that we move from a place of wanting the world to conform to what we like [towards]...How your cognitive biases lead to terrible investing behaviors “Let me walk you through the biggest traps that you should be aware of that are a danger to your...Is free will a fallacy? Science and philosophy explain. Philosophy asks if free will is real. Neuroscience reveals why the answer is more complicated than we expected.Why 2025 is the single most pivotal year in our lifetime "We're living in an extraordinary moment in history. We are at a moment here in 2025 where we have world...Even AI is self-censoring. Here’s why that matters. If the people controlling AI are biased, the output will also be. Free speech scholar Jacob Mchangama makes the case...
-
Columns
ColumnsMini Philosophy Mini Philosophy is a space to explore ideas. It’s where we pause the busyness of life to reflect on ourselves,...Starts With A Bang Understand how the universe works with Ethan Siegel.Books Big Ideas. Thoughtful Conversations. One Book at a Time.The Long Game A Big Think Business column written by investor Eric Markowitz, focused on the philosophy and practice of long-term thinking.The Well Exploring life's biggest questions, publication by the John Templeton Foundation and Big Think.13.8 A series exploring the beauty and power of science in culture by Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser.
-
Classes
Featured Classes
- My Account
- Sign In
- Membership
- More
In this 5-part Big Think Mentor workshop Mihnea Moldoveanu teaches us how to systematically analyze the epistemic structure of networks by using a diagramming tool called the epinet. In this lesson Moldoveanu introduces us to epinet basics. Moldoveanu is Associate Dean of MBA Programs at Rotman School of Management. His latest book is Epinets: The Epistemic Structure and Dynamics of Social Networks.
Mihnea Moldoveanu: An epinet is a diagram. It's a diagram that lets me figure out and map and keep track of what you're thinking, what you're thinking I'm thinking, what other people in the room think about what I'm thinking and what each thinks about what every other person in the room is thinking. That sounds like a lot and that's why you need a diagram. And it's a little bit different than your traditional social network diagram in that you don't have only people that are connected by edges and lines, you also have various beliefs. So if I think that you think that today is Friday, then there's going to be an arch that takes us from me to you to the proposition today is Friday. If I think that you think that I think that today is Friday, there's an arch that takes me from me to you back to me and back to the proposition today is Friday.
Why is this very helpful in the context of something like a meeting or a gathering of any kind or an email exchange? When we have a meeting there are a lot of unspoken suppositions and a lot of attributions that I make. I think about what other people think and what they think I think, and sometimes I have conversations with somebody that are meant to be dramaturgical, so they're meant to be a piece of theater that we play out for the benefit of other people in the audience. So I might try to persuade you that it's a good thing for you to put your hat in the ring for a presidential race or a decanal race, not because I think that's a good thing but because I think somebody else thinks that I don't think that's a good thing. I want to persuade that person that in fact I think highly of you.
So, what I've done in that case is I've used the topology of the beliefs that various people have and the beliefs that they have about other people's belief in the room to create a situation. So you can think of an epinet first of all as a diagram, but then you can also think about it as a design tool. And it's a tool for the design of human interactions in context that are high-stakes, interpersonally acute if you will because that's where we spend a lot of time obsessing about what everybody thinks and what everybody thinks we think. And complicated. Even the very simple structures that I was telling you about have a very complex interactive belief hierarchy. There are things that I believe that you don't know about. There are things that you believe that I don't know about. There are conjectures that you have about what I think, which I am oblivious of because I can't even imagine some of them. And there are things that I can conjecture about you which you may be oblivious of.
And it's very important to not necessarily to obsess and to become neurotic about this, but it's important to be precise. And it is valuable to be precise. And that is what a lot of the epinets work that we've done tends to show that more greater precision, greater depth, so if I think more carefully about what you think and what you think I think and what you think I think you think, then it makes me more likely to respond to your concerns. It makes me more likely to address problems, issues and complaints that you might have. It makes us more likely to be able to coordinate our actions successfully. It makes us more able to co-mobilize in order to do something that's important to both of us. And that comes from greater precision, it doesn't come necessarily from a catchall theory like let's say game theory or interactive epistemology that go bonkers in terms of the formalism, but they don't focus on the precise structure of the beliefs as they occur in a human group interacting in real time.