Search
Philosophy Of Science
Not everyone accepts the scientific consensus; some even make careers out of challenging it. But only a select few do it the right way.
It’s not a gambit. It’s not fraud. It’s not driven by opinion, prejudice, or bias. It's not unchallengeable. And it's more than facts alone.
Leading a scientific revolution is easy: you just have to succeed where the current theory fails while equaling its successes. Good luck!
Mathematics and religion both embody awe-inspiring, eternal truths.
John Templeton Foundation
Scientific pluralism is the notion that some questions must be approached from many angles. How can we integrate these scientific models?
It’s not a gambit. It’s not fraud. It’s not an opinion. And it’s not biased like you think it is. Most of us, when we think about what science is, default […]
Every physical theory has constants in it. The gravitational constant is remarkably uncertain. When we first began formulating physical laws, we did so empirically: through experiments. Drop a ball off […]
The story of John Couch Adams, “the man who failed to discover Neptune,” and his cosmic redemption. Perhaps its human nature to want to only think positive thoughts about our […]