“In a surprising legal brief filed late last week, the US Department of Justice suggested that the government’s long-standing support of the controversial practice of patenting genes might be coming to an end. The brief, filed on Friday in a landmark gene-patent lawsuit, argues that simply identifying an important DNA sequence within a genome is not enough to justify a patent. Instead, such a discovery is akin to finding coal and removing it from the earth, or separating cotton fibres from cotton seeds, lawyers for the US government wrote. ‘Common sense would suggest that a product of nature is not transformed into a human-made invention merely by isolating it,’ they wrote.”
Search
Federal Gene Patent Challenge
After years of supporting gene patents, the federal government has unexpectedly challenged controversial applications on naturally occurring DNA sequences.
"In a surprising legal brief filed late last week, the US Department of Justice suggested that the government's long-standing support of the controversial practice of patenting genes might be coming to an end. The brief, filed on Friday in a landmark gene-patent lawsuit, argues that simply identifying an important DNA sequence within a genome is not enough to justify a patent. Instead, such a discovery is akin to finding coal and removing it from the earth, or separating cotton fibres from cotton seeds, lawyers for the US government wrote. 'Common sense would suggest that a product of nature is not transformed into a human-made invention merely by isolating it,' they wrote."
Special Issue
George Raveling — the iconic leader who brought Michael Jordan to Nike — shares with Big Think a lifetime of priceless wisdom learned at the crossroads of sports and business.
14 articles